| Fan Art / Cartoons & Comics / Digital / Movies & TV | ©2013 ~Onikage108 |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
Vizsla seems to have "warrior" confused with "warlord." The Mandalorians were always awesome warriors with their own distinct code of honor... Vizsla was a murdering self important terrorist just in love with killing for the sake of killing. Satine's philosophy may have been flawed... but Mandalore seemed to be doing very well with neutrality and pacifism. Vizsla thought it would ruin them... so he himself arranged to ruin them so he could save them. Just seems a little hypocritical for a guy who claims to have "honor." Oh, and he shot an unarmed little girl just to prove how tough he was. Screw him.
Maul knows he's bad. He doesn't pretend to be anything else. And I love him for it.
I used to think they killed off Maul just to come up with new characters to sell more toys... but I think they would have been able to sell more by keeping Maul alive and giving him different outfits, kids certainly think he's cooler than Dooku. Now I think you're probably right that Maul was intended just to be an assassin and not a mastermind (though I'm glad we're seeing now that he is!), he didn't get much of any character development, but I think that was intentional since he was just a nameless assassin working for a secret villain... a sort of "phantom menace" if you will.
Still, I don't think Maul's looks really would have been an issue given what most of the other separatist leaders looked like.
Yeah, Maul could have and should have filled Grievous' role.